Effective ultraviolet C light disinfection of respirators demonstrated in challenges with Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores and SARS-CoV-2 virus.

BACKGROUND: The global COVID-19 pandemic, accompanied by spikes in the number of patients in hospitals, required substantial amounts of respiratory protective devices (respirators), thereby causing shortages. Disinfection of used respirators by applying ultraviolet C (UVC) light may enable safe reuse, reducing shortages. AIM: To determine whether UVC disinfection is applicable to enable repeated safe reuse of respirators. METHODS: The UVC chamber, equipped with low-pressure mercury discharge lamps emitting at 254 nm, was used to determine the sporicidal and virucidal effects. Respirators challenged with spores and viruses were exposed to various UVC energy levels. Deactivation of the biological agents was studied as well as UVC effects on particle filtration properties and respirator fit. FINDINGS: A 5 log10 reduction of G. thermophilus spore viability by a UVC dose of 1.1 J/cm2 was observed. By simulating spores present in the middle of the respirators, a 5 log10 reduction was achieved at a UVC dose of 10 J/cm2. SARS-CoV-2 viruses were inactivated by 4 log10 upon exposure to 19.5 mJ/cm2 UVC. In case UVC must be transmitted through all layers of the respirators to reach the spores and virus, a reduction of >5 log10 was achieved using a UVC dose of 10 J/cm2. Exposure to a six-times higher UVC dose did not significantly affect the integrity of the fit nor aerosol filtering capacity of the respirator. CONCLUSION: UVC was shown to be a mild and effective way of respirator disinfection allowing for reuse of the UVC-treated respirators.

A Review of Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators.

During the current COVID-19 infectious disease pandemic, the demand for NIOSH-approved filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) has exceeded supplies and decontamination and reuse of FFRs has been implemented by various user groups. FFR decontamination and reuse is only intended to be implemented as a crisis capacity strategy. This paper provides a review of decontamination procedures in the published literature and calls attention to their benefits and limitations. In most cases, the data are limited to a few FFR models and a limited number of decontamination cycles. Institutions planning to implement a decontamination method must understand its limitations in terms of the degree of inactivation of the intended microorganisms and the treatment's effects on the fit and filtration of the device.